As the first Judge replacement, for the Jury of the international trial against assad, just in case one of the Judges in the main Jury gets incapacitated, or wants to be replaced, I nominate VZ of Ukraine, moreover putin-senza-putina is dead, in 10 months now.
I was thinking about a possible second replacement, somebody from the italian Ministry of Justice, but after the italian prosecutors have forged charges against myself, I am extremely cautious about. We’ll see, time will tell…
I would also like to emphasize on one of the rules of the decision regarding the sentence against, it is allowed a maximum of one Judge to abstain from voting, and that only if the decision at that stage in the voting would not be a virtual tie, of the final vote. Let’s say, if at some point, 5 of the Judges of the Jury have expressed their vote, in favor or against something, one of the two remaining Judges can abstain from voting, but if at some point in the sentence decision making process, the result would be a tie, of 3 in favor and 3 against, the last remaining Judge in the Jury to cast his or her decision, cannot abstain from voting.
As well, I could exceptionally decide to replace a Judge in the Jury, if that Judge would show increasing concerns regarding his or her vote in favor of the extreme penalty, against assad, which I hope is not going to be the case, except for the teenage christian syrian girl, for which expressing and voting for an outspoken death penalty against assad, may be disturbing, mostly if one or both of her parents are deceased, as a result of torture in the illegal detention centers of assad.
Evidence, of course, will be administrated, testimonies will be filed, and I would appreciate if the transition regime in Syria would give WPC and WTP, all their cooperation, and will not obstruct the justice.
As a footnote about Cecilia, I would expect, according to the international criminal code, that the iranians would explain the reason for her arrest, and not prolongue too much before filing charges against her, if at all. Otherwise, minding that there are limits and restraints for somebody being arrested, based on the International Criminal Code, without charges being filed, of up to maximum 90 days of detention, it is expected to be released before this deadline of arrest without charges being pressed. As well, a quid-pro-quo with the iranian arrested in Milan would be an unacceptable blackmail, since the iranian is suspect for being involved in arms traffic. Any prisoners swap in this case would be a terrible judicial error from the italian authorities, but in the same, the iranian suspect cannot be extradited to any country requesting so. According to the ICC, he should be subject of interrogation and criminal prosecution, according to the laws in effect, on the territory of the country where he was arrested, and should be, in this case, prosecuted and brought to trial by the italian criminal authorities. Those would be real charges, not elucubrations of fantasia and imagination of using nicknames, like the pathetic italians tried against me. I didn’t use the identity of anybody else, if it was somebody doing so, were the feds!
So help us God Almighty!!…